with Bob Condly
Tag

plain

Silent Speech, Part 1

(https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/set-of-male-and-female-characters-expressing-silence-using-hand-gestures-such-as-gm1479152978-507221184)

Looking back at the last two blog posts I wrote (“Plain Speech” and “No Contradiction”), I’d have to say I’m creating a series. Today’s post combines aspects of the main issue discussed in the first two: direct and deep communication. I found additional verses in the book of Acts which on the surface contain inconsistencies. 

But they don’t. It’s only an impression.

Luke has a way of layering spiritual and historical matters and if we meditate on these elements, we can grow in our understanding of the mind of Christ.

We’ll look at one verse this week and cover the second one next week. Here’s the first verse: “When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, ‘Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life’” – (Acts 11:18 [NKJV]).

Let’s begin with the background.

Acts 10 relates the account of Peter’s call to preach the gospel to a Gentile named Cornelius. He was a Roman centurion who had no ethnic connection to Israel, but he admired the Jewish faith and practiced it to an impressive degree. God noticed his dedication, and sent an angel to tell the officer to send soldiers to ask Peter to come to his house and teach him and his household.

Cornelius obeyed, and Peter accepted the invitation, but only after some reflection. The apostle was still accustomed to the principle that Jews would defile themselves by entering into the homes of Gentiles and eating with them. So God showed Peter a vision of a large sheet on which were all different kinds of animals. Since it was noon and Peter was hungry, the Lord told Peter to pick one and prepare it. He objected because these animals were unclean; to eat one would be to disobey the Mosaic law. But God told him He was declaring these animals clean.

This vision occurred three times in succession; the Lord must have wanted to drive home the point! While Peter was trying to figure out what he’d witnessed, the soldiers showed up at the house and invited him to visit Cornelius.

By the time Peter arrived, he knew what the Lord was teaching him. It wasn’t about animals, but people. The Gentiles were welcome into the family of God, too. All that mattered was faith in Jesus Christ; one’s ethnicity made no difference.

While Peter preached, the Holy Spirit fell on the audience, thereby proving that God accepted them. So Peter baptized the new converts. If God welcomed them, he would do so, too!

But Peter got into trouble for his efforts. Acts 11:1-18 describes how Jewish Christians objected to Peter sharing meals with Gentiles. Not good; you have to keep your distance!

But the apostle rehearsed his vision and his experience. It was clear to him that God was bringing Gentiles into the church like He had been leading Jews to acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah.

All this is the background of Acts 11:18. When the Jewish believers finished listening to Peter, they ran out of arguments. Having nothing to add, they fell silent.

But they also spoke up.

These Jewish Christians reached the same conclusion that Peter had arrived at: Gentiles can now become members of God’s family like the Jews. 

A superficial reading of the verse presents a contradiction: a silent group speaking. People can’t do both at the same time!

But Luke wasn’t being silly; he was stressing how Christ was opening up the people of God. Through Him, all could have access to the Father. And the seal of the Spirit reinforced that this was indeed God’s will and plan.

The verse has no discrepancy; Luke’s reporting is accurate. The first Christians abandoned their objections to the universality of the gospel.

These believers serve as a good example for us. How do we react to a verse or passage in the Bible that rubs us the wrong way? What do we say when God seems to be doing something we hadn’t anticipated?

It’s natural to argue. Peter didn’t condemn his challengers, and Jesus won’t reproach us. But He will inform and correct us. The Lord wants us to know His heart and if we humble ourselves to listen, we will. And when we learn the truth, we need to drop our opposition. It’s time to adjust!

Again, Jesus isn’t mad at us for having opinions. He’s aware of what’s in our hearts; He understands how we see things. But by His Word and His Spirit, God is always working to bring us into alignment with Himself. He won’t quit on us.

So let’s be honest enough to bring our ideas and perspectives to the Lord. But let’s also pay attention to what He communicates to us. When we learn what’s on God’s heart, we grow silent. Not because we’re afraid to talk, but because we’ve discovered another dimension of His amazing truth. He’s sharing His knowledge with us, and that’s an amazing blessing. The best response?

Praise and thanksgiving!

“How great are Your works, LORD, how profound Your thoughts!” – Psalm 92:5

Silent speech–it’s a skill worth developing!

No Contradiction

(https://assets-global.website-files.com/63c7f7e7c44658910415843b/63cab67851b430e055d1970d_contradiction_07-scaled.jpeg)

Last week we looked at the biblical notion, popularized by the Quakers, of “plain speech.” While it’s easy to think of this in terms of vocabulary, the phrase has a broader meaning. It emphasizes directness, which involves simplicity and boldness. We speak plainly when we know the truth and aren’t afraid to share it. We don’t have to hesitate; we can deal with important issues without delay. And we don’t need a thousand words when ten will do. We get to the point.

But as I’ve been reading the book of Acts, I noticed an instance in which Luke (the author of the book) seemed to contradict himself. This passage doesn’t reflect the straightforward manner of communicating we talked about in the previous post. Does that mean we were wrong? Or does it only appear that Luke contradicts himself? Let’s look at the verses to find out.

The apostles performed many signs and wonders among the people. And all the believers used to meet together in Solomon’s Colonnade. 13No one else dared join them, even though they were highly regarded by the people. 14Nevertheless, more and more men and women believed in the Lord and were added to their number. 15As a result, people brought the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats so that at least Peter’s shadow might fall on some of them as he passed by. 16Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by impure spirits, and all of them were healed. – Acts 5:12-16

In this short paragraph, Luke is summarizing the status of the early church in Jerusalem. He begins and ends his report with miracles. God was backing up the gospel with impossible feats of His power! Demons lost their grip on people and diseases fled in the name of Jesus.

How would those healed and delivered react? We can assume that many, if not most, became Christians. The miracles supported the apostolic message that Jesus Christ was no longer dead. God had raised Him out of the grave and made Him Lord of heaven and earth.

Numerous conversions. 

A whole bunch of new believers.

This is a sensible conclusion to reach, except that vss. 13 and 14 look like they refute each other. “No one else dared join them . . . nevertheless, more and more men and women believed in the Lord and were added to their number.” Which is it? Did people join the church or not? According to vs. 13, they didn’t. According to vs. 14, they did.

Not exactly plain speech!

Now, Luke’s a smart guy. He was a physician (see Colossians 4:14) and an historian. He researched records and witnesses for his gospel (see Luke 1:1-4) and wrote the earliest account of the history of the church (the book of Acts). He also served alongside Paul in the ministry of the gospel (see Acts 16:10-17; 20:5-15; 21:1-18; 27:1-37; 28:1-16; 2 Timothy 4:11; Philemon 24). So he knew how to communicate!

What was he trying to say in the passage quoted above? The references to miracles which begin and end the paragraph don’t contradict each other. We’re safe there; we can believe Luke is rehearsing facts that took place in the first church.

But was the church growing? Elsewhere in Acts, Luke insists that it was. Here are some examples:

  • “Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day.” – Acts 2:41
  • “And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.” – Acts 2:47b
  • “But many who heard the message believed; so the number of men who believed grew to about five thousand.” – Acts 4:4
  • “So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.” – Acts 6:7

Acts 5:14 fits in with these verses. If it wasn’t for verse 13, we’d have no problem! So what was Luke getting at when he said that “no one else dared join them”? If no one else joined the church, the church didn’t grow. But it was growing, so people were joining it.

You see the problem!

I think that Luke is using this historical situation to illustrate what takes place in the hearts of people who hear the gospel. This involves social and spiritual dimensions.

Regarding conditions on the ground, the apostle is telling us that the opposition of the religious authorities to the apostles was strong and was itself deepening (see Acts 4:1-22; 5:17-42; 6:8-8:4; 12:1-12).

But if persecution was gaining strength, so was the gospel! Becoming a disciple of Jesus called for courage; the willingness to live a new way under Christ’s authority. And those who governed the affairs of Jerusalem and Judea didn’t appreciate the competition. They were happy with the control they had over others and were in no mood to loosen their grip on power.

To announce Jesus as Lord was to challenge the systems of the world. The apostles were willing, as were many of those who heard the gospel.

But some balked at the idea. They weren’t sure. They admired the apostles and were amazed at the miracles being done in the name of Jesus. But to affiliate with the church could alienate the authorities. Who wanted to take that chance?

Luke presents the inner struggle and the resulting public treatment of the church. People wanted supernatural blessings, but not at the expense of offending the religious hierarchy.

In the end, they had to choose. Some opted for security. Respect Jesus from far away. Watch, but don’t get involved. Stay safe.

Others decided the Lord was worth the risk. The gospel was true and the signs confirmed it. Go all in!

To summarize, Luke doesn’t contradict himself in Acts 5:13-14. He’s expressing social and spiritual dimensions of the spread of the gospel and how people react to it. For a while, people were afraid and awed; scared of the religious leaders but astounded by the signs and wonders. Some never overcame their fears but others thought that what they’d seen and heard was too good not to be true! The evidence–the lives of the Christians and the miracles of the Lord–convinced them that the gospel was God’s Word. Jesus was indeed the Messiah, the Savior. And the only appropriate response is to join His followers. 

Openness and awareness will help us when we read the Bible. If we find  incongruities or paradoxes, we might be tempted to dismiss them. But let’s take a different tack. Let’s accept them. We don’t have to figure out every last detail in Scripture, but if we stay humble before the Lord, His Spirit will reveal the truth to us. 

The truth in the Word.

And the truth about ourselves.

with Bob Condly

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

Verified by MonsterInsights