with Bob Condly
Tag

teaching

The Devotional Life of the Church

(http://awrestaurants.com/sites/default/files/%40dvclmn%20Instagram.jpg)

“They were continually devoting themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” – Acts 2:42 (NASB)

I saw an error that wasn’t there!

Sometimes I’ll read a passage in the Bible too fast and when I do, I risk making a mistake. This will happen even when I double check things in the Greek text of the New Testament. If I’m not being patient and slow, I’ll read something that wasn’t there or else I’ll miss something that was.

This happened a short while ago and I want to share it with you.

As you can tell, it has to do with the verse I posted above. The title of this article describes the content of the verse: the devotional activities of the first Christians.

The NASB adds the word “continually” because the verb tense stresses that the early church engaged in these practices all the time. This is a lifestyle, not a “try it and see” approach. 

So we know who is the subject of the sentence: the first Christians. And we know what they were doing: they were devoting themselves.

To what? What were they committing themselves to?

Luke, the author of the book of Acts, lists four behaviors. We could reformat the verse to look like this:

They were continually devoting themselves:

  1. To the apostle’s teaching
  2. And to fellowship
  3. And to the breaking of bread
  4. And to prayer

But did you notice my goof? I added an “and” to item number 3. Look at the verse above; “and” isn’t there.

Does that make a difference?

At first, I believed it did. If Luke wanted to make a simple list of four devotional practices, he could have (should have!) arranged them in similar fashion.

Also, Greek has no “apostrophe s” to indicate possession. It uses the word “of” instead. So the reference to the teaching that belongs to the apostles is, word for word, “the teaching of the apostles.”

I don’t bring this up because it’s a big deal; it doesn’t change the meaning of the first item. But it does make it look more like the third one:

  • The teaching of the apostles
  • The breaking of the bread

Did you catch that? I inserted “the” before “bread.” The NASB doesn’t do that, but the word is in the Greek text. Bible scholars make judgment calls about whether to translate the definite article, and in this case, they decided not to.

But perhaps they should have. Because the definite article is also attached to the second and fourth items, even though it goes untranslated.

Finally, as the NASB observes in a note, the word “prayer” is plural. This might connect it in some way to the other plural, “the apostles.”

Assembling all these details, Acts 2:42 now looks like this:

They were continually devoting themselves:

  1. To the teaching of the apostles
  2. And to the fellowship
  3. To the breaking of the bread
  4. And to the prayers.

That “the breaking of the bread” line is missing an “and” still bothers me! Adding one would make this phrase adhere to the form of the others. Nice and well-ordered.

But Luke didn’t do that!

So I have to accept the Bible as it’s written. Don’t we all?

Yet when we do, we get the privilege of learning the mind of the Lord. In this case, Jesus wants to teach us something about His first followers.

Rather than going with the form I preferred, the Holy Spirit guided Luke to arrange the verse as a chiasm. That’s a fancy term which means the bulk of the verse has an ABBA structure.

A: The teaching of the apostles

B: And the fellowship

B: The breaking of the bread

A: And the prayers

This means that the As have something in common, and the Bs do, too. A seems to deal with the relationship of the Christians to God. B concerns the relationship of the Christians to each other.

And other verses in Acts support this interpretation of devotional practices. In Acts 6:4, Peter declares as much for the apostles:

“But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word.”

 Yes, the word “devote” is the same verb that’s in Acts 2:42! 

And a few verses down, Acts 2:46 connects fellowship and breaking bread:

“Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of heart”

“Day by day continuing” reminds us of “continually” in vs. 42. And what were the disciples doing in the temple? No doubt praying and listening to the preaching of the gospel! That’s A! But they also spent time in various homes. Sharing meals and spending time together. The early church lived their devotion to Jesus!

So Acts 2:42 is well organized, even if at first I didn’t think so!

But there’s more.

Instead of using an ABBA template, we can try another one, ABAB. This results in a zigzag:

A:The teaching of the apostles

B: And the fellowship

A: The breaking of the bread

B: And the prayers

The Bs supplement the As. From this perspective, the first AB pair shows us that fellowship was an opportunity for believers to discuss and work out the apostolic messages. And then the second AB pair suggests the integration of prayer and eating. There’s no better way to depict the Lord’s Supper!

This post started because I thought there was an “and” missing in Acts 2:42. Turns out I was wrong, and thank God I was! This gave me a chance to learn what Jesus instilled in His own from the earliest days. May our churches follow their example as we devote ourselves to Christ.

Continually.

Missing

(http://spectrummagazine.org/sites/default/files/imagecache/large_article_image/missing.jpg)

A few weeks ago, Vanessa Samuel asked me to write a guest post for her blog, https://christfollower85.wordpress.com, which focuses on worship.

Because worship is (or ought to be) a significant component of discipleship (see Matthew 28:16-17), I welcomed the chance to contribute to the discussion. Thank you, Vanessa, for inviting me!

Here is what I wrote:

When loved ones go missing, we jump into action! Years ago, during a visit to a mall in the Chicago suburbs, one of my boys vanished near an open court. I saw him one moment and the next, he was gone. Frantic, I focused my eyes like a camera lens and darted all over, trying to track him down. After an anxious minute or two, we found him. He’d strolled over to his grandfather. No big deal for my son, but a near heart attack for me!

People matter to us. That’s why we publicize those who’ve disappeared. We put photos on the sides of milk cartons, issue AMBER Alerts, and  broadcast stories on television.

People matter to God. The first question recorded in the Bible was God’s query to Adam, “Where are you?” And Jesus said that a good shepherd would leave an entire flock to chase down one sheep that got away. The Lord cares when folks don’t show up and He wants Christians to pursue them. But first we have to notice their absence.

You know who’s missing from church?

Men.

As David Murrow reveals, the average American congregation is 61% female and 39% male. Between 70-80% of participants in mid-week services are women. And overseas, ladies outnumber guys in church by as much as 9:1.

Murrow traces this phenomenon to the age of industrialization. Around that time, men began to leave their farms to work in factories. Away from home, they relinquished church-related responsibilities to the ladies. As a result, the female perspective came to dominate every aspect of church life, including worship.

British theologian Ian Paul describes one effect as “the move away from familiar, rhythmic, structure songs to more unpredictable, emotive and interiorising songs.” Unfortunately, as Paul Coughlin concludes, “worship music is often too sentimental for guy tastes.”

Yet another factor dissuades men from engaging in worship. Murrow claims that the professionalization of music ministries, coupled with the introduction of too many new and unfamiliar songs, reinforces passivity. Churchgoers become spectators, and this is problematic for men in particular since most males gravitate toward activity and accomplishment. They need to take part but feeling uninterested or inadequate, they pass.

He recounts that “as I visit churches around the country, I’ve frequently observed that the majority of attendees do not sing. They stand motionless, looking at the words on the jumbo screen . . . I’d guess that only a quarter of the men sing.”

I can confirm this. At last Sunday’s service, I scanned what I could of the audience around me to see who was singing. At the beginning of the worship set, I watched more congregants refraining than participating. And almost no men sung. By the end, more people had joined in, including men, but not a lot. Everyone stood, but few sang.

How can we instill in men the vital experience and persistent habit of worship?

We can demand change. Pastor Doug Bursch disputes the premise that churches have feminized and professionalized their services. And even if they did, he rejects those as valid excuses for not worshipping God. Basing his argument on the account of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4, Bursch reduces the problem to the condition of men’s hearts. Like Cain, guys offer second-rate worship to God when they ought to give Him their best, as Abel did. The solution is not to change Sundays but to transform souls. The fear of the Lord will achieve this.

“You shall fear only the Lord your God; and you shall worship Him and swear by His name.” – Deuteronomy 6:13 (NASB)

Besides requiring repentance, we can also depict the fulfillment that comes from worshiping God. In Real Men Worship, music ministry leader LaMar Boschman frames healthy masculinity within the context of devotion to the Most High. And Merlin Carothers wrote several books expounding the blessings and benefits of praising God.

“The Lord is my strength and my defense; He has become my salvation. He is my God, and I will praise Him, my father’s God, and I will exalt Him.” – Exodus 15:2 (NIV)

Repentance and encouragement may persuade men to honor the Lord. But remember “the Sunday clothes. The contemporary love songs to Jesus. The winding sermons. Typical dudes don’t thrill to any of those things.”

If we want to motivate men to worship, there’s something else we need to do.

We must teach them.

I’m not talking about sermons and Sunday School classes that promote praise and worship. I mean choosing, crafting, and performing songs that instruct Christians in their faith.

A few months ago, I wrote a blog post about this subject. In that article, I analyzed admonitions Paul wrote to two different churches. Here are the passages:

“And do not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit, 19speaking to one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord; 20always giving thanks for all things in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ to God, even the Father.” – Ephesians 5:18-20 (NASB)

“Let the word of Christ richly dwell within you, with all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with thankfulness in your hearts to God. 17Whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks through Him to God the Father.” – Colossians 3:16-17 (NASB)

Ephesians grounds worship in the Holy Scriptures; Colossians, in the Holy Spirit. Apart from that difference, both epistles affirm that songs educate. Paul disregards issues that capture the attention of many Christians today, like how lyrics make us feel or which musical style wins God’s approval. Instead, he cares about how worship ministry edifies the church.

Pastor John MacArthur insists that “worship is directly correlated to understanding. The richer your theology, the more full your grasp of biblical truth, the more elevated your worship becomes.”

Emotions have value, but they follow dedicated expression. As Pastor Eugene Peterson writes, ”worship is an act that develops feelings for God, not a feeling for God that is expressed in an act of worship.”

Murrow observes that contemporary worship songs are less “about” God and more “to” Him. In other words, our lyrics favor “You” over “Him.” He recommends more of the latter because, he contends, men prefer those kinds of lyrics.

But we find both types in the psalms. For example, Psalm 111 exalts God for His good deeds toward Israel:

“Praise the Lord. I will extol the Lord with all my heart in the council of the upright and in the assembly. 2Great are the works of the Lord; they are pondered by all who delight in them. 3Glorious and majestic are His deeds, and His righteousness endures forever. 4He has caused His wonders to be remembered; the Lord is gracious and compassionate. 5He provides food for those who fear Him; He remembers His covenant forever. 6He has shown His people the power of His works, giving them the lands of other nations. 7The works of His hands are faithful and just; all His precepts are trustworthy. 8They are established for ever and ever, enacted in faithfulness and uprightness. 9He provided redemption for His people; He ordained His covenant forever–holy and awesome is His name. 10The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; all who follow His precepts have good understanding. To Him belongs eternal praise.” (NIV)

In Psalm 5, the writer addresses God Himself:

“Listen to my words, Lord, consider my lament. 2Hear my cry for help, my King and my God, for to You I pray. 3In the morning, Lord, You hear my voice; in the morning I lay my requests before You and wait expectantly. 4For You are not a God who is pleased with wickedness; with You, evil people are not welcome. 5The arrogant cannot stand in Your presence. You hate all who do wrong; 6You destroy those who tell lies. The bloodthirsty and deceitful You, Lord, detest. But I, by Your great love, can come into Your house; in reverence I bow down toward Your holy temple. 8Lead me, Lord, in Your righteousness because of my enemies–make Your way straight before me. 9Not a word from their mouth can be trusted; their heart is filled with malice. Their throat is an open grave; with their tongues they tell lies. 10Declare them guilty, O God! Let their intrigues be their downfall. Banish them for their many sins, for they have rebelled against You. 11But let all who take refuge in You be glad; let them ever sing for joy. Spread Your protection over them, that those who love Your name may rejoice in You. 12Surely, Lord, You bless the righteous; You surround them with Your favor as with a shield.” (NIV)

So while Psalm 111 talks about God in the third person, Psalm 5 speaks to Him in the second person. (Sorry to get grammatical there!)

But Psalm 3 does both:

“Lord, how many are my foes! How many rise up against me! 2Many are saying of me, ‘God will not deliver him.’ 3But You, Lord, are a shield around me, my glory, the One who lifts my head high. 4I call out to the Lord, and He answers me from His holy mountain. 5I lie down and sleep; I wake again, because the Lord sustains me. 6I will not fear though tens of thousands assail me on every side. 7Arise, Lord! Deliver me, my God! Strike all my enemies on the jaw; break the teeth of the wicked. 8From the Lord comes deliverance. May Your blessing be on Your people.” (NIV)

While I appreciate Murrow’s concern, the Bible frees us to sing to the Lord and about Him. We don’t have to choose between them.

Let’s make sure our hymns and choruses communicate significant biblical themes. While our songs needn’t substitute for sermons, they should complement them. A deep song will give people something worth pondering throughout the week.

By memorable music, we transport into mundane routines the spiritual lessons we absorb in worship. The songs of the church can teach men how to conduct themselves in God’s kingdom and in their jobs. Peterson suggests that “worship should be a renewal of work, not an escape from our work.”

Songs that address the heart and nourish the mind benefit all believers in Christ.

Including men.

 

with Bob Condly

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

Verified by MonsterInsights